Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 10,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
BC Court: Aborted sale should have proceeded - vendor did not conceal property's propensity to flood
6 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
Moreover, the encroachment that did exist was a minor one and in no way rendered the residential premises unfit for habitation.The purchaser was bound to close the transaction and, as a result of his failure to do so, was found liable to pay damages including the decrease in the sale price obtained by the vendor and various carrying costs incurred when the property had to be offered for sale again.Read the decision at: Ganges Kangro Properties Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:00 am
In the case of Santiago v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:08 pm
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:19 am
It stated (among other things) that all users of the employer’s computer systems were bound by it, that emails would be monitored, including for investigations, and should not be assumed to be private. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:45 am
This week in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:22 pm
In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 12:17 pm
Under a California Supreme Court decision in Robins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its decision in Pat Tate as Administrator of the Estate of Michael Traffanstedt v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Supreme Court survive overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
Let's Just Cut to the Chase, Please GUEST POST BY MICHAEL CARUSO Yesterday, the 11th Circuit decided U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:39 pm
Huber v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
See Jain v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
"The seminal case concerning the impact of the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement on an individual's statutory rights under Section 75 of the Civil Service Law is Antinore v State [40 NY2d 6].In Antinore the Court of Appeals held that in the event an individual elects to proceed with a disciplinary proceeding set out in a collective bargaining agreement, he or she may not later claim the right to relitigate the charges under a statutory due process… [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:35 pm
D’Agostino v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Authors of rewritten opinions will be bound by the law and precedent in effect at the time of the original decision. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:01 am
Limited v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 7:09 am
Bound by California decisions holding that SLUSA continued state-court jurisdiction over class actions under the Securities Act, the state court denied Cyan’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.SLUSA amended Securities Act Section 22 to close a loophole in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act that many feared could lead to abusive litigation. [read post]
