Search for: "Centers v. State"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 21,993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 11:56 am
A recent court case involving a New Jersey insurance plan (Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of N.J. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:54 am
In the back half of the episode, discussion turns to the sudden appearance of military commission charges against Hambali, the GTMO implications of a recent story about SOF manhunting operations attempting to capture Islamic State leaders in Syria, and the legal implications of accepting intelligence from and otherwise becoming enmeshed in detention centers run by the UAE in Yemen (in light of a story alleging torture at those centers). [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:09 pm
Tort, Jr. and Lewis Stein, who tried and participated in the appeal of Hersch v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:30 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Eight) rejected that argument in a published opinion, re-affirming Rifkind & Sterling, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
Rick Wilson, drafter of the EU amicus brief in Roper v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm
Northwest Environmental Defense Center (NEDC) sued the Oregon State Forester and members of the Oregon Board of Forestry in their official capacities and various timber companies. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 5:56 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
California law compels “crisis pregnancy centers” whose mission is to provide alternatives to abortion to advise clients that the state of California offers free or low-cost abortion, contraception, prenatal counseling, and other services to eligible women. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:41 pm
McConnell, Richard and Frances Mallery Professor of Law, Stanford Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School and former Judge, U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court has repeatedly said that the importance of conflicting state rules doesn’t matter, in cases such as AT&T Mobility and Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
Beginning in July, the law firm Bursor & Fisher P.A. began an effort to thwart the merger by using AT&T’s own arbitration agreements against it – the same arbitration agreements that were at the center of the United States Supreme Court’s recent, and well publicized, decision AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Since all of the requested information was not provided, the 30-day period in which Progressive was obligated to pay or deny the Hospital's claim did not begin to run as was held in Westchester Medical Center v State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., Hospital for Joint Diseases v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co, New York & Presbyterian Hosp v Countrywide Insurance Co. and Montefiore Medical Center v Government Employees… [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
Adler) Many constitutional conservatives were critical of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
United States, 536 U.S. 545 and applying Apprendi v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:42 am
The Tax Court in Whistleblower 22716-13W v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
(Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Court Jurisdiction) Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
"And in precisely two months from today, the Epic Games v. [read post]