Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 2701 - 2720 of 4,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
The piece considers what sort of future a Big Tech dominated vision of digital health might hold for privacy rights, autonomy and society. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The barrister sued various members of the Bar Council, including David Barniville who was later appointed a High Court judge, claiming defamation, breach of constitutional rights and of competition law by use of a dominant position. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Nazune Menka
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held in Becerra v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:04 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:13 am by Lyle Denniston
   The petition in National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:04 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  That is the issue before the United States Supreme Court in Elonis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
News The phone hacking scandal continues to dominate the legal media news agenda. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]