Search for: "Doctor v. State" Results 2701 - 2720 of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2009, 3:18 pm
Well, folks, that kind of claim handling is why they own those big buildings in most downtown metropolitan cities.Ever since the 2003 decision in State Farm v Campbell, the courts have been restricting the availability of punitive damages as a deterrent to big business fraud, greed and just plain stupidity.What we said before about Dead Donkeys and Car Dealers (click here) is still true. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In particular, she did not submit any doctors’ affidavits or medical records documenting the severity of her condition (see Matter of Brigade v Olatoye, 167 AD3d 462 [1st Dept 2018]; Santana v Union Hosp. of Bronx, 300 AD2d 56 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm by Robert McKennon
  After his doctors stated that Burnett’s psychiatric condition prevented him from performing his job duties, he filed a claim for STD benefits. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am by Tim Rozelle
Doctors determined Lubinski should be transported by air ambulance to receive lifesaving treatment in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
Among the more relevant opinions, her doctors stated: "At the time of the motor vehicle accident of 2006, [she] was reported by her treating caregivers to be in a state of remission from psychotic symptomatology, and was, at the time, compliant with suggested treatment. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
In the latest episode of The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The resolution of conflicting medical evidence is within the sole province of the Medical Board, and it [is] entitled to credit the diagnosis of its own doctors over that of the petitioner's doctor" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d 847, 849). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The resolution of conflicting medical evidence is within the sole province of the Medical Board, and it [is] entitled to credit the diagnosis of its own doctors over that of the petitioner's doctor" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d 847, 849). [read post]