Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2014, 7:32 am
” Id. at 1340-41. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed the denial of the suppression motion.First, the Court held that although a Pennsylvania Magisterial Court Judge is not a judge of a state court of record as Rule 41(b) requires, Rule 41(b) does not apply here because the search was a state search in character: among other things, the search warrant was issued at the request of a state trooper indicating a violation of state law, and federal involvement in the search and seizure was,… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:11 pm
’487 patent col. 2 ll. 33–41. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
In Slight v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:44 am
Read on… 1. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
§ 300mm-41(b)(1). 2. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
What TWU does shouldn’t be acceptable. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm
Fox listed the following five external notices that contractors will need: (1) Notification to labor organizations of the contractor’s obligations under VEVRAA and Section 503 (41 CFR §60-300.5(a)(10) and 41 CFR §60-741.5(a)(5)); (2) Notification to subcontractors and vendors of company policy related to the contractors affirmative action efforts (41 CFR §60-300.44(f)(1)(ii) and 41 CFR §60-741.44(f)(1)(ii)); (3)… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:58 am
” 41 C.F.R. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
She returns to America and sues the hotel in American courts.[41] (Assume the hotel company does enough business in America that American courts have jurisdiction over it.) [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:08 am
Prescription opioids kill five times more Americans than heroin does. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
§ 41 et seq., respectively. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:02 am
If you haven’t put your wishes down on paper yet, you’re not alone: Some 41% of Boomers and 71% of those under 34 polled by AARP said that they didn’t have a will. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
So naive comparisons won’t cut it — and, I argue, neither does propensity score matching. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
It brought a claim for trade mark infringement under sections 10(2) and (3) of the Trade Mark Act 1994 [= Arts 5(1)(b) and 5(2) of the Trade Mark Directive] and passing off; Fox counterclaimed that the trade mark was invalid. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
EEO clauses (41 CFR §60-300.5(d) and 41 CFR §60-741.5(d)). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:48 am
The claim here does not do so. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
Solano County ALUC (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372.) [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
Commonwealth, 41 Va.App. 250, 584 S.E.2d 444 (Virginia Court of Appeals 2003). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Op. at 41-42 & n.36 (emphasis original). [read post]
