Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 2701 - 2720 of 2,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
The ribbon is the #1 reason why, I “Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:39 am
  Interestingly, the 96 hires as of 3/8/09 is 1 more than the 95 hires that  I counted in Larry's 3/19/08 list. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Lord Neuberger gives five reasons: (1) the opening words of s 167(2) do not suggest that such an assessment is required. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:07 pm
As Gilbert points out, the question, as Koss posed it, is far too ambiguous: What does having sex "because" a man gives you drugs or alcohol signify? [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
The Wood case demonstrates an exception to this rule: The power to appoint does not support a claim of the power to remove an incumbent when removal from the position in question is provided for by statute.William J. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234 (no-law argument, ex post facto, retroactivity, separation of powers) State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:31 am
Democrats hold a 58 to 41 advantage in the Senate. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 1:40 am
**Mark Lemley wrote in 58 Stanford LR 601:Chester Carlson, a patent attorney, invented xerography in 1938. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:29 am
Regrettably, the Government's piecemeal approach to the removal of Government-unique restrictions has been disappointing and arguably does much less to "lure" commercial contractors into the federal marketplace than many in Congress would have hoped in enacting prior commercial reforms. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:39 pm
He said he does not want to die, but is willing to die, and does not expect to be released, in part because he has vowed never to register as a sex offender. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
An important point discussed at the Workshop is that it does not matter why the Justices want to build larger coalitions. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 5:05 pm
[Disclosure 1: I published an op-ed about Kelo, available here, so maybe I am part of the hype.] [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:56 am
 Of those under 40 who thought gender matters, the majority preferred male supervisors for 1) keeping confidential information private (64%), 2) giving better direction (58%) and 3) giving more constructive criticism (56%). [read post]