Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2015, 1:53 pm
[v] http://history.house.gov/People/Listing/R/RANKIN,-Jeannette-%28R000055%29/[vi] Walter Cronkite, NPR. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Case C 379/14 TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd; Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV might have been one such case in the eyes of its parties and participants, though this Kat isn't so sure. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Differences from WTO’s approach to the 3 step test, which is very formalistic. 10(1) v. 3 step: latter is narrow in scope and reach, whereas quotation can be interpreted broadly. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 2:55 am
I've followed numerous nullity cases before the Federal Patent Court of Germany and related discussions in courts hearing infringement cases (where nullity cannot be decided, but the outcome of nullity cases must be predicted because a strong prognosis of invalidation results in a stay). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am
Miller examined how to balance privacy and security on surveillance in Germany. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:35 am
Klaus Grabinski noted that in Germany injunctive relief is automatic, but this is usually accompanied by an order to render accounts. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
” Peter Swire summarized his testimony on U.S. surveillance law before the Irish High Court in Schrems v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:37 pm
Again, Epic v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
Steve Baldwin of A&O and Philipp Widera of Simmons & Simmons gave an overview of case law on SPCs in the UK and Germany resulting from recent CJEU references. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
The AmeriKat understands there has been no news from Germany and the UKIPO has already held an initial stakeholder meeting to illicit feedback (the AmeriKat understands the general stakeholder consensus being "you don't need to do anything"). [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 6:18 am
Sol IP's 16 additional SEPs-in-suit have probably simplified Ford's calculus.Ford was not directly involved in the amicus brief campaign surrounding the en banc petition in Continental v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm
A Manifesto in Times of War” which argued for a new approach in Germany’s foreign policy. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:56 pm
Given that the readership of the two weblogs is not coterminous and that this post is of substantial interest to the copyright community, it seemed prudent to make sure that readers of the 1709 Blog got to see and, if necessary, act upon it.Two Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) copyright cases are the subject of an invitation to comment, issued by the UK Intellectual Property Office as a means of evaluating whether the UK government should make observations to the court.The… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:49 pm
Case of Escher v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:01 am
That's the basis on which he distinguishes cases like Huawei v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more difficult to… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Although Germany generally adheres to the real seat theory, the OLG Frankfurt a.M. [read post]
