Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 2701 - 2720 of 25,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
On September 30, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted the State of Michigan's petition for a writ of certiorari to appeal the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals' reversal of Smith's murder conviction. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:04 am
Plaintiff's renewed motion for a preliminary injunction precluding defendant "from launching in the United States its generic raloxifene product" was granted where defendant conceded infringement but contested validity and enforceability. [read post]
5 May 2016, 12:34 pm by Ted Max
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on Monday, May 2 and agreed to hear the case in Star Athletica LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:03 am
United States (07-330) in support of the judgment below. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:51 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently granted summary judgment in favor of Youtube, Inc., owned by Google, Inc., holding that Youtube qualifies for “Safe Harbor” under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The fact that the United States has recommended a denial strongly weighs against a grant, but the fact that the Court did not immediately denies cert somewhat mitigates the government’s position. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:28 am by Kali Borkoski
  It granted one new case, Clapper v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State (Fishing Rights) United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlConfederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:06 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Aboriginal Land Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlState v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
"On Wednesday, CAAF will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:05 am
Evid. 504.United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:56 am by Eric Lipman
United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am by Colin Miller
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]