Search for: "HILL v. STATE" Results 2701 - 2720 of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2015, 3:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Obviously, the President can do nothing about state laws on this subject.Third, mandatory death penalties are contrary to the Supreme Court's decisions in Woodson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
Although the State possesses a "strong interest in enforcing its criminal judgments without undue interference from the federal courts," Hill v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm by John A. Gallagher
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
The Fourth Amendment is concerned with reasonable probabilities (see Hill v California, 401 U.S. 797, 804, 91 S. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]