Search for: "House v. House"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 41,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
The facts of Peter Schmidt, about a winding up petition, and JK v MK, about a consensual divorce, were very different from those in the present case. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:30 am
," The New Humanitarian, 28 Feb. 2023 [text]Government of Canada increases sponsorship opportunities for Sponsorship Agreement Holders (Feb. 2023) [text]"Most Britons think housing Ukrainian refugees is a good thing, study shows," The Guardian, 12 March 2023 [text]Poland’s hospitality is helping many Ukrainian refugees thrive – 5 takeaways (The Conversation, March 2023) [text]"Refugee-averse Japan welcomes Ukrainians after Russia war," ABC News, 25… [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
“We are brought irresistibly to the conclusion,” said the majority in Eisner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Office of Personnel Management The Bulk Data for Me but Not for Thee Award: Los Angeles Police Department I Wanted to Clarify That My A** is Covered Award: White House The Transparently Proud of Destroying Public Records Awards: Michael Gableman The Ancient Art of Dodging Accountability Award: Cyber Ninjas The Transparency Tax Award: Mendocino County The Burn After Reading Award: Immigration and Customs Enforcement The MisFIRE in All Directions Award: Irvington Township (I'm Not… [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 2:50 pm
” Morse v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
The problem with vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: "Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Ryan Reft, Library of Congress, has posted Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
Robert represented the National Residential Landlords Association in the case of Rakusen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
While the conference was held under the Chatham House Rule, several of the expert participants are taking part in a public question and answer series to illuminate some of the pressing issues addressed during the conference sessions that merit further analysis. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:15 am
But the Federal Circuit’s decision in Lite-Netics, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:15 am
But the Federal Circuit’s decision in Lite-Netics, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Signal Cos. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
As part of this analysis, the appellate court also noted the limitations on denials under the Housing Accountability Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
The case deals with the topic of whether the registration of slogans is allowed by EU trade mark law.Katfriend Paolo Maria Gangi reviewed the decision of the Southern District Court of New York, issued on 14 February 2023, seeing the French Luxury House Hermès against NFT creator Rothschild.Katfriends Gillian Tan and Mark Teng discussed a recent decision issued by the Court of Appeal of Singapore clarifying the meaning and application of Singapore's judicial understanding of… [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:16 pm
—Will Rogers 1Dominish v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
The success of Google’s appeal in Lloyd v Google and the decision in Warren v DSG Retail (see our post here) seems to have halted 2021’s flow of data breach claims. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
The usual consortium of conservative libertarians and civil liberties advocates who have historically opposed Section 702 is now joined by those in the House of Representatives who have expressed concerns regarding the “weaponization” of the federal government. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
