Search for: "Jacob Rule"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 3,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:24 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
Consequently, the Appeal Court ruled that Art. 57 was not satisfied, despite the fact that Neutrokine- ? [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
Consequently, the Appeal Court ruled that Art. 57 was not satisfied, despite the fact that Neutrokine- ? [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
A spokesperson for LVMH welcomed the move, stating that French ruling protects consumers from becoming a victim due to the “illicit use of trade marks”. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
”). [7] This Article assumes that Rule 22 is constitutional, or at least that no court would dare invalidate a longstanding internal Senate rule. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:27 pm
Two years later, in 1996, Congress amended the Jacob Wetterling Act with Megan’s Law which mandated “community notification” when a sex offender moves into a given neighborhood. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
Dutchess County The rule in New York is that a child cannot sue his or her parents for damages resulting from negligent supervision. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:28 am
A judge in New Hanover County ruled in favor of Boseman, saying North Carolina laws do not preclude same-sex couples from adopting. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:13 am
The Board began by citing the oft-cited decision in Jacobs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:10 pm
In fact, many non-profits can benefit from more favorable rules under the immigration regulations than those that apply to for-profit entities. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Staten Island Community Hospital, 582 F.3d 268 (2d Cir. 2009), the Second Circuit for the first time recognized this distinction, ruling in a non-employment disability rights claim that the federal/state laws are not coterminus with the City law.In this case, the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Hall) applies Loeffler to employment discrimination cases, reinstating the City sexual harassment claim which does not require "severe or pervasive" harassment but proof that… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
In her letter to the editor, Jacobs mentions a 2007 case in Pennsylvania where the "court ruled that a child could . . . have three legal parents. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs and Cabranes) reverses and find jury issues on some of the retaliation claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
By having the death penalty, we're letting our baser emotions rule our lives. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:30 pm
And from the paper: Consider Jacob and Youngs from a Bayesian perspective. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
The exclusions, being things that are not considered to be inventions [Article 52(2) EPC] are: discoveries; scientific theories; mathematical methods; aesthetic creations; programs for computers; presentations of information; and schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
This ruling "narrowed the Court's jurisprudence in the area of employee speech by further restricting the speech activity that is protected," the Second Circuit tells us. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Jacobs v. [read post]
