Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 2701 - 2720 of 8,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 6:12 pm by Rory Little
But then Justice Kennedy asked, “would your rules apply equally in a criminal case? [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Among multiple blogs concluding that Justice Kennedy looks to be the swing vote, a post from Inside Higher Ed states that, either way, Kennedy’s vote will likely have a majority behind it. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito, dissented. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
Justice Kennedy has stated that although strict scrutiny need not be fatal, nor should it be feeble. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Adam Klein
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:22 am by Immigration Prof
In this piece on Immigration Impact, Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia analyzes Justice Anthony Kennedy's "upside down" argument at the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:14 am by SHG
” And Justice Kennedy writing for the Court in Nguyen v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by CJLF Staff
  CJLF filed an amicus brief in one of the North Dakota cases, Beylund v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:53 am
Justice Kennedy authored the 7-1 opinion for the Court in Welch v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
” More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm by Amy Howe
Kennedy, for example, observed that many states will revoke the license of a driver who refuses to take a blood or breath test – a civil penalty. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:51 pm by Douglas Berman
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]