Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 3,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2020, 1:52 pm
For an example of these problems, see U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm
As affirmed by Gummow J in Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co[30], “whilst a trade mark remains on goods, it functions as an indicator of the person who attached or authorised the initial use of the mark”. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Olde Belhaven, in the case of Shadowood Condominium Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:49 am
Levy, 626 So.2d 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:35 am
The petition, Suhr v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
ONGC Bhatia International and Nirma v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm
Nierotko and the 2014 ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
A Canadian cloud makes every email and download abroad subject to CASL -> Competitive Keyword Advertising Permitted As Nominative Use–ElitePay Global v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm
Supreme Court in Janus v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
The Press Gazette has commented on the Report’s publication focusing on its suggestions that technology companies be subject to a levy to finance regulation. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Ins. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Levy-Gray, 894 A.2d 563, 577 (Md. 2006); Nolan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
In a submission to the Department of Justice review of the Defamation Act 2009, the Public Relations Institute of Ireland has argued that the press regulator should be able to levy fines on publishers Japan The Supreme Court has rejected a right to be forgotten claim against Google by a man convicted of child prostitution. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
