Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 1:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiff twice attempted to amend his complaint in an attempt to overcome the pleading concerns, but each time the motion as to the PKF parties was granted, without prejudice. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiff twice attempted to amend his complaint in an attempt to overcome the pleading concerns, but each time the motion as to the PKF parties was granted, without prejudice. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
The insurance effects such waiver when, "the plaintiff's claim falls within the purposes covered by the defendant's policy. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:32 am
  The insured had separately purchased excess liability coverage for several of the underlying policy periods.By 2004, the insured had been named as a defendant in more than 24,000 lawsuits, each alleging bodily injury from exposure to the insured’s products. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by Stuart A. Carpey
Let's assume there are two defendants who are each 50 percent at fault and one of these defendants is bankrupt. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:53 pm by S2KM Limited
However, the most recent financial statements for ELNY (as of December 31. 2010) show assets of $905,945,200 compared with liabilities of $2,474,317,342 resulting in a negative surplus of $1,568,372,142. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:38 am
The New Mexico Liquor Liability Act creates different standards of care for dram shop liability depending upon the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:40 am by Philip J. Berenz
 The first thing that needs to happen is that the defendant's insurance company will send over a sometimes lengthy contract called a "Release," where the insurance company / defendant agrees to pay you the agreed-upon sum only if you agree to drop the lawsuit (or never file one). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
  467 F.3d at 89-92.Fresh from deciding to ignore the Sixth Circuit, Desiano also looked past the fraud-on-the-FDA-related floodgate holding back the possible torrent of state liability, and saw only that liability itself. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Jon Hyman
Clarity and certainty of potential liability also allows for both sides to set realistic litigation budgets and evaluate whether cases are worth bringing and defending. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:11 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
” This is such an issue that some insurers have set up a separate subrogation department with staff trained to recognize liability situations and opportunities for recovery of the amount paid on the workers compensation claim. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As appears to be the case in connection with WaMu, the FDIC and the BankUnited shareholders were essentially competing with each other for the same pool of insurance dollars. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Plaintiff's complaint included claims of negligence and strict products liability against each of the defendants. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
McBride involved the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, which protects railroad workers who are injured on the job. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Jeffrey Krivis
In large product liability cases, there is usually a significant self-insured retention which is managed in-house by the manufacturer. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:45 am by emagraken
 All the Defendants were apparently insured with ICBC. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:54 am by Judge Bonnie Sudderth
  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:47 am by David Rossmiller
Part of this was designed to bring more certainty to indemnity issues under "occurrence" liability policies, but another part was designed to relieve insurers of the duty to defend in many instances -- construction defect cases are often massive and expensive to defend, with defense costs exceeding indemnity exposure in a high percentage of cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:21 am by Lisa Baird
Howell first distinguished Hanif on the basis that the plaintiff in Hanif was a minor who had not assumed any personal liability for his medical expenses, and had Medi-Cal insurance, as opposed to private health insurance. [read post]