Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 2701 - 2720 of 20,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm by Nate Cardozo
Ethiopia's lawyer argued next, taking the position that it should be able to do anything to Americans in America, even set off a car bomb, as long as Ethiopia didn’t have a human agent in the United States. [read post]
The case concerned an Algerian national (the appellant) who entered the United Kingdom in 1996 and was refused asylum. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:48 pm by Francis Pileggi
Supr. 2024), the Delaware Supreme Court recently responded to questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit by confirming that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am by centerforartlaw
I needed to prepare to work on the first case of a foreign country suing in the United States to recover cultural property. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:47 am by zshapiro
Section One states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
United States, “[s]ome of the world’s biggest tech companies pleaded with the Supreme Court … to update decades-old precedent governing telephones, saying that cell-tracking technology threatens Americans’ most fundamental privacy rights. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
As detailed in this order list, the Supreme Court this morning granted cert on United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
By:  Doug Christensen and Chris Amundsen On June 17, 2010, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court resolved the case of New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional… [read post]