Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
Akamai v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 7:44 am
The court found no state action.In Farfan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm
Related Cases: Rubin v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
As the Board of Appeal had correctly stated, "the loss of reputation rarely happens as a single occurrence but is rather a continuing process over a long period of time, as the reputation is usually built up over a period of years and cannot simply be switched on and off [...] in addition, such drastic loss of reputation for a short period of time would be up to the applicant to prove". [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
Mark also came with us to Washington in 2008 to try to stop [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:35 pm
A product is falsely marked if it identifies a patent ostensibly covering the product where (i) no such patent exists; (ii) the patent is expired; or (iii) the patent listed does not cover the product.Now the CAFC has ruled in Pequignot v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:00 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Parallel Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
PRWeb The Owners’ Counsel of America is pleased to announce that Mark V. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Hearst Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
| Can the god of wealth be registered as a trade mark, and why? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
” Mark Sherman reports at AP that “the accuracy of the once-a-decade population count is at the heart” of the case,” Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
Classic Liquor Importers, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:15 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Mark A. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
Yesterday the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
