Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2701 - 2720
of 21,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm
Chicago, I demonstrated that the decision is a voting paradox, illustrated the paradox, and explained why the "narrowest grounds" rule of Marks v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Vidal v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:59 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:55 am
[Smith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
In Miller v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
[3] Skidmore v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:37 pm
In another article, Amgen v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm
See Rambus v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Malaysia. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:19 pm
Introduction This year marks the seventy-fifth anniversary of West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
In February 2006 Grain Harvesters’ trade mark attorneys responded by enclosing a sample of packaging, stating that the use of SUPREME had been this way on the packaging since the early 1990s and saying that their client had made no changes from what had been done in the past. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:54 am
Sti. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
