Search for: "Matter of D."
Results 2701 - 2720
of 52,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 8:50 am
This post was contributed by Bruce D. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
Teixeira), so I thought I’d revisit the matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Why does Minnesota's state budget matter to eaters across the country? [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:58 pm
Korn submitted the criminal matter to the D&O insurer of Senior Associates. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
Westchester County appealed Supreme Court denial of its motion for summary judgment.The Appellate Division reversed the lower court's determination and granted Westchester's motion for summary judgment.The court explained that McCue contended that the County violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(a) by terminating his employment for attending a political candidate's press conference.Although Labor Law §201-d(2)(a) makes it unlawful for any employer to… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
” The following is the text of Twitter’s proposed jury instructions on what it terms “unpatentable subject matter”: Even if an invention is both new and not obvious, a patent claim may be invalid if its subject matter is not patentable. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:06 am
In doing so, the EPA noted that it had no discretion in the matter as the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:01 am
(D. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
They needed the accommodation for the new caretaker and established their right as a matter of law to do so. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
They needed the accommodation for the new caretaker and established their right as a matter of law to do so. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
They needed the accommodation for the new caretaker and established their right as a matter of law to do so. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 10:46 am
Part of the reason for that is that often the underlying matters to which the insurers contend the Bump-Up Provision applies often involve signifi [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:09 am
Section 87, subsection (d) Subsection (d) of UCIOA's Section 87 is quite troubling. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
As PEF alleged that State had violated statutory rights under §209-a(1) (d) by failing to bargain over a past practice that was not specifically covered by the CBA the Appellate Division concluded that "the matter is not a breach of contract dispute and PERB's jurisdictional limitation was not triggered. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
As PEF alleged that State had violated statutory rights under §209-a(1) (d) by failing to bargain over a past practice that was not specifically covered by the CBA the Appellate Division concluded that "the matter is not a breach of contract dispute and PERB's jurisdictional limitation was not triggered. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
As PEF alleged that State had violated statutory rights under §209-a(1) (d) by failing to bargain over a past practice that was not specifically covered by the CBA the Appellate Division concluded that "the matter is not a breach of contract dispute and PERB's jurisdictional limitation was not triggered. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
As PEF alleged that State had violated statutory rights under §209-a(1) (d) by failing to bargain over a past practice that was not specifically covered by the CBA the Appellate Division concluded that "the matter is not a breach of contract dispute and PERB's jurisdictional limitation was not triggered. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:08 am
As an initial matter, the baseline assumption should be that remedies should be the same for operating companies and NPEs alike. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 6:39 am
In this case the Surrogate’s Court considered whether the petitioners presented sufficient evidence of undue influence for the court to declare a will invalid. [read post]
