Search for: "New v. New" Results 2701 - 2720 of 165,877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
The Tiffany v. eBay litigation is set to begin today (my past coverage) and traditional news sources are starting to pay attention again: CNN Money, WSJ, Washinton Post, PC Magazine, Reuters, WSJ Law Blog (with a shout out - thanks Peter) [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 11-7-14 Stockbridge-Munsee Cert Petition_(filed) Questions presented: In Petrella v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Many thanks to the blog reader who wrote to draw my attention to Parks v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:56 am by Ettinger Law Firm
One famous case that allowed for the beneficiaries to reform or modify a trust, Saunders v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:01 am
At the end of yesterday's hearing in Tafas/SmithKlineBeecham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:51 am by Cari Rincker
Here is a case example of how fraud was successfully plead by the wife in Rich v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:42 am
As Dave over at No-Fault Paradise pointed out earlier today, the New York Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal in LMK Psychological Servs. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:35 am by Andrew Hamm
SCOTUS grants 14-361, Ocasio v US on extortion conspiracy and 14-520, Hawkins v Comm Bank on spousal guarantors on credit applications. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
Alongside duty abolition campaigns, publishers took their dispute over copyright in news copies to court, which produced two landmark decisions in copyright jurisprudence: Walter v Steinkopff (1862) and Walter v Lane (1900).Chapter 6 and Chapter 7 cover the role and successes of American press associations in securing protection, both on the front of copyright (over the “form” of published copies but not the “substance” of the news) and… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court upheld that claim (in a ruling titled Cooper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm by Brian Scott
As early as 1918 in the case of International News Service v Associated Press 248 U.S. 215 the US Supreme Court has held that there can be no copyright in facts or 'news of the day'.Courts have been reluctant to afford literary copyright to titles, characters and news headlines. [read post]