Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 2701 - 2720 of 9,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 3:26 am by SHG
In the scheme of the worst thing ever that will end the world, the Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:27 pm by Lara Fowler
On the last possible decision day, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Florida v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
The president has “plenary and exclusive power … as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” the Supreme Court noted more than 80 years ago in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
Congress decided that not every person who wishes to enter into the United States gets to do so at will. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
One could quibble with the Seventh Circuit order, which refers to the injunction as "STAYED as to geographic areas in the United States beyond the City of Chicago" [emphasis added]; footnote 1 of Justice Thomas's opinion is more precise, distinguishing places and parties. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
United States has lots of new directions in it. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
§1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Hilary Hurd, Yishai Schwartz
The provision empowers the president to “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” if he “finds” that entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
In accord with ancient principles of the international law of nation-states, the Court in The Chinese Exclusion Case (1889), and in Fong Yue Ting v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:05 am by Anonymous
View the original article here.Recently, in a 6-to-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Hold the Front Page has a comment on the Sarker case entitled “Judges are reminded that Section 4(2) orders are a ‘last resort’”. [read post]