Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 11,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2025, 9:53 am
Trump’s return to the White House have been muted in Russia in recent months: Russian officials know that Mr. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
Nothing in Powell v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Zang found that advertising that targets people of certain races or ethnicities can be harmful because it exposes marginalized consumers to discriminatory advertising in important areas such as housing, employment, and credit. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Golinsky v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
The Act is there to protect people against unjustified harassment. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
People who are married typically are not only connected emotionally and legally but financially as well. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am
A couple of years prior, in 2011, a Democratic House of Representatives member, Heath Shuler, tried as well to sponsor a bill ending the wait, but his bill also died in committee. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Penthouse Bindrim v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
CDC’s own experts reportedly objected to the policy and refused to support it in court; it was implemented only after the White House pressured the CDC to accept it. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:43 pm
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm
On April 21, 1896, the Court of Appeals of New York in People v Barberi, 149 N.Y. 256 (available on Westlaw Next at this link) ruled that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
While in that house in 2020, he came across a firearm. [read post]
