Search for: "People v. House" Results 2701 - 2720 of 11,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
The Act is there to protect people against unjustified harassment. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:13 am by Rudyuk Law Firm
People who are married typically are not only connected emotionally and legally but financially as well. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
A couple of years prior, in 2011, a Democratic House of Representatives member, Heath Shuler, tried as well to sponsor a bill ending the wait, but his bill also died in committee. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
CDC’s own experts reportedly objected to the policy and refused to support it in court; it was implemented only after the White House pressured the CDC to accept it. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm by Harold O'Grady
On April 21, 1896, the Court of Appeals of New York in People v Barberi, 149 N.Y. 256 (available on Westlaw Next at this link) ruled that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As explained, the officers found a group of people who claimed to be having a bachelor party with no bachelor, in a near-empty house, with strippers in the living room and sexual activity in the bedroom, and who fled at the first sign of police. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
While the Court did not disapprove of application of the Rogers test, it also did not approve of use of this speech-protective test (unlike the Congressional members of the House Judiciary Committee: see the “Balancing First Amendment concerns” section of the legislative history for the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:10 am by Brianne Gorod
  When the Court decided to hear King v. [read post]