Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 10:31 pm
Storms, Tulare County Superior Court – Visalia, Case# 08 230432 which resulted in a $13.3 million dollar jury verdict. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:44 pm
” Other polls I cited in the same piece show that a surprising 40% of self-identified Tea Party supporters agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
In practice, this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am
On May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:52 pm
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 300; Burch v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:34 am
Superior Court judge declares mistrial over attorney’s competence in murder case.) [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:00 am
The Los Angeles Times this morning runs the following editorial on AT&T v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
And Max Gardner’s Operation Strike Back is where you’ll find the people who eat, sleep and breathe what courts all over the country are deciding every day. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
San Diego Superior Court Judge Steven R. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:36 am
As Wikipedia notes, mandamus is a judicial remedy “in the form of an order from a superior court to any . . .subordinate court . . . to do or forbear from doing some specific act”. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:59 am
Concern that prisoners were being tortured to death was at the heart of the landmark 2008 Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Rico of the Los Angeles County Superior Court also ordered certain Watson executives to testify under oath about the company's pain patches. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:02 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Cal.App. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:27 pm
In Wills v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 1100 (2005), the court found that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because AT&T had not shown that bilateral arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effects of class actions. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:34 pm
See, e.g., Zubulake v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:15 am
Federal Express Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
So, the court denied discovery and let the superior court take the next step, to dismiss the class action (most likely).The case is Starbucks v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 1:05 pm
In New York, judges may not issue appearance tickets. [read post]
