Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 2,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
It was reported that in 1998, the Swedish Supreme Court rejected to recognize the Bavarian state as a copyright holder of Mein Kampf. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:57 am
The Role of Patents in Pharmaceutical Innovation Patents serve as a powerful incentive for pharmaceutical companies to invest in research and development. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Has helped to create some of most powerful companies, but onus still on © owners to police. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
First, for the moment, no copyright claim has persuaded a court that licensing is required to avoid infringing the rights of copyright holders in scanned/scraped works used to train AI models.[3] And no US court has yet ruled against the argument that such use of content to train AI models is protected by fair use principles, which permit use of a protected work to create transformative new works.[4] Second, as a practical matter, the economic forces propelling the growth… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm
But you can overstate the degree of what’s learned v. social. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
First, Kerr says that Smith is inconsistent with United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
As lawsuit-inspiring musicians go, you can’t do much better than 2 Live Crew. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 11:35 am
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– Larry O’Dell, CBS2 Chicago, July 26, 2010 A federal appeals court on Monday reversed a judge’s ruling requiring prompt installation of upgraded emission controls at three coal-fired power plants in Tennessee and one in Alabama. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Compare the incentive in a descriptive use case: the decided cases don’t give us a random sample of the relevant situations, but I can’t say I see many with motives to appropriate the plaintiff’s goodwill—instead at most I see indifference to the plaintiff’s goodwill and interest in using the descriptive benefits of the term at issue, from “Gatorade is Thirst Aid” to “Sealed with a Kiss” to “Own Your Power. [read post]
