Search for: "Ross," Results 2701 - 2720 of 11,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 8:42 am by Tom Smith
Adding to the sting is the fact that the chief justice wasn’t just along for the ride on the closely watched ruling: He penned the majority opinion, which essentially accused Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross of lying about his reasons for seeking to add the question on citizenship. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
The Supreme Court yesterday did not find the citizenship question that Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross decided to add to the census improper, find that Ross had any improper motive for including that question, or find that his decision to include that question was contrary to law. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
New York, the court ruled 5-4 that although Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’ decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census did not violate the Constitution’s enumeration clause or the Census Act, his stated reasons for doing so were pretextual, and that the question can’t be added until the department provides an adequate explanation for the decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
Today, the court intends to announce “all remaining opinions ready” from this term, as Chief Justice John Roberts put it Wednesday. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
As we explained in our complaint and as the district court’s decision found, Secretary Ross “was determined to reinstate a citizenship question from the time he entered office. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 12:05 pm
  Roberts noted one eeiney, weeney, tiny, problem, that being that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross asked to have the citizenship question included within a week of taking office. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:14 am
They maintained that, even if Ross’ decision to add the citizenship question wasn’t pretextual, it still violated the federal laws governing administrative agencies because he decided to ask the question even though all of the evidence “indicated that asking the question would produce citizenship data that is less accurate, not more. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am by Amy Howe
Ross’ announcement drew an immediate legal challenge from New York and other state and local governments, as well as immigrants’ rights groups. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:39 am by Ruthann Robson
New York on the issue of whether the decision by Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross to include a... [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
., declared that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had used a “contrived” explanation for adding that question to census forms, so it ordered Ross and his aides to examine the issue all over again. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:28 am by Tom Smith
"The evidence tells a story that does not match the explanation (Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross) gave for his decision," Roberts wrote. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
New York, a challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census, “urged the justices to deny what [they] characterized as the government’s ‘extraordinary request’” that the court decide a question raised by new evidence in another case: “whether Ross intended to discriminate against Hispanics” when he added the question. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:32 pm by Amy Howe
In April, a federal judge in Maryland had ruled for civil-rights groups challenging Ross’ decision, but he rejected their claim that Ross had intended to discriminate against Hispanic voters. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:15 am by Yige Wang
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Tuesday granted a motion to remand the Fifth Amendment equal protection claim and the 42 USC § 1985 claim in a Maryland case against Wilbur Ross, US Secretary of Commerce, where the plaintiff claimed that the motives behind the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census were discriminatory. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:47 am by Lyle Denniston
The administration, in response to those new complaints, has made strenuous efforts in lower courts to show that the new evidence is not trustworthy and definitely does not provide a basis for concluding that Ross or other officials acted out of a discriminatory motive. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:58 pm by Daily Record Staff
Nolan, of counsel with Smith, Gildea & Schmidt LLC, a regional law firm with offices in Towson and Baltimore, won the Will Ross Medal for outstanding volunteer accomplishments and impact by the American Lung Association. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
In a letter from Dale Ho of the ACLU, the groups notified the justices that a federal district judge in Maryland had ruled that new evidence discovered in the files of Thomas Hofeller, a Republican redistricting strategist, had created a “substantial issue” about whether Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross had intended to discriminate against Hispanic voters. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:32 am by INFORRM
Ross Clark in the Spectator compared the Guardian’s trenchant stance against phone-hacking at the time of the Leveson Inquiry with what he derided as its “politically motivated” decision: “How it could be any less offensive to record a conversation through the walls of a private flat – effectively bugging the property – and then publish the details even when police have investigated the incident being recorded and decided no crime has taken place? [read post]