Search for: "STATE v CLARK"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 3,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 10:49 pm
In essence, the courts will likely have to decide whether students should now be considered as the consumers of a service, moving the issue into the sphere of private law (and revisiting the case of Clark v University of Lincolnshire and Humberside). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:49 pm
Bank v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:36 pm
Ed. 2d 647 (1984), and adopted in State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In its table of cases cited, it lists the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:34 pm
Travelers or Spencer v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
McKaig v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
At one point, the Deputy Minister tells the Agent that he will “keep him in the loop” about other bids and states that the last bidder might have “certain advantages. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
Emcare, Inc., 444 F.3d 403, 409-12 (5th Cir.2006) (finding § 541.304‘s language is ambiguous and resorting to DOL for interpretative guidance); Clark v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
Monday in the case of Montana v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:39 am
Timberline Camplands, Inc, (1st Dept. 2005) - $315,000 for 40 year old Clark v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling in Bahena v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
Lynn (1st Dept. 2010) - $150,000 for 71 year old with improper bridge that caused pain, gum swelling and need for 20 implants and 14 crowns [case discussed here] Clarke v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Here is the abstract: The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Bilski v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:04 pm
” People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
In People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
