Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 3:51 am
In theory, an Indian court can order a buyout of dissenting shareholders under section 394(1)(v) of the Companies Act, but I am not aware of such discretion having been exercised in practice, at least not in any of the high-profile schemes of arrangement.3. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:45 am by WSLL
Kite, dissented, stating that the Limited Warranty Deed clearly and unambiguously reserved a one-half mineral interest to the seller, Appellant. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Personal Keepsakes, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:48 am by Dan
In large transactions, the Chinese seller usually bears the risk. [read post]