Search for: "State of New York et al" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORP., ET AL., No. 08-CV-377 (JFB) (MLO);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:08 am by Scott R. Powell
District Court in Manhattan heard oral arguments in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
Humanitarian Law Project et al. (08-1498), and Humanitarian Law Project et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:28 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted McGraw Hill and Moody's (together, the "Ratings Agencies") motions to dismiss in both Tsereteli v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:33 pm by jefhenninger
Pasquale Parello, et al.,(01 Cr. 1120) in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges of racketeering and mortgage fraud. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm by Sheppard Mullin
” Twenty-eight cases were filed in state and federal courts and consolidated in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
City of New York (1978); (2) whether the severity of a regulation’s economic impact on a going business concern should be measured by diminution in value or diminution in return; and (3) whether the purpose of a government regulation is still a relevant consideration under the “character” prong of Penn Central, in light of this Court’s repudiation of the “substantially advances a legitimate state interest” test. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:56 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
The position staked out by Lindsay Graham et al. favoring military commissions over federal criminal trials for the Gitmo detainees we plan to charge with wrongdoing as the “best way to render justice, win this war and protect our nation from a vicious enemy,” is not especially more coherent. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
The position staked out by Lindsay Graham et al. favoring military commissions over federal criminal trials for the Gitmo detainees we plan to charge with wrongdoing as the “best way to render justice, win this war and protect our nation from a vicious enemy,” is not especially more coherent. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Therefore, the courts of the Member States must apply the New York Convention (and their national laws on arbitration) in a way which conforms to EU law. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:56 am by Beck, et al.
  In none of them is a claim asserted that could survive Frye, et al. [read post]