Search for: "State v. George" Results 2701 - 2720 of 6,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 12:58 am by rhapsodyinbooks
This case held that “[a] State may sue in the Supreme Court to enjoin payment of a judgment in behalf of a British creditor taken on a debt, which was confiscated by the State, until it can be ascertained to whom the money belongs. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:52 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Sawyer, versus the unilateralist vision of the president as “the sole organ of our Nation in foreign affairs” trumpeted by Justice George Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:04 am
The conviction was affirmed just last Friday, in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:25 pm by Liisa Speaker
George v Sandor M Gelman, PC, 201 Mich App 474 (1993).The Michigan Court of Appeals (MCOA) affirmed the lower court’s decision reducing the amount of an attorney’s charging lien in RivertownDevelopment Group v West Congress Street Partners, No. 330728.Facts:Petitioner Lawrence Walker was retained in May 2014 as counsel for West Congress Street Partners in a litigious landlord-tenant dispute. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Circuit denied various motions to intervene or for reconsideration of motions to intervene as follows: The motion of the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:08 pm
After Coullitte responded that the protest would only be allowed if it did not involve nudity, Wyner and respondent George Simon filed a complaint against Coullitte and other state officials (also petitioners here) alleging that the prohibition of nudity violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]