Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 2701 - 2720
of 9,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
Last Thursday, after seven years of coursing through various boards of appeals and courts in Europe, the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) held in their robust judgment in Rubinstein and L'Oreal v OHIM (Case C-100/11) that the General Court did not err in law in concluding that L'Oreal's mark for BOTOCYL and Helena Rubinstein's mark for BOTOLIST took advantage of the distinctive character and… [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:24 am
A marriage isn’t over until the government says it is. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Hardy Callcott, T. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 8:08 am
Gadzinski v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
[and,][t]o the contrary, the textbooks introduced as evidence purport, on their face, to have been published outside of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:54 am
Newman v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
L. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Karimi Alavijeh, 2022 QCCDPHA 28 (CanLII) [80] La Cour d’appel du Québec fait ainsi sienne la position de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta, qui enseigne que pour déterminer si une recommandation conjointe est ou non contraire à l’intérêt public, il ne s’agit pas pour le juge de rechercher la sentence qu’il juge lui-même appropriée et la comparer à celle faisant l’objet de… [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Ermini v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:46 pm
“Keep,” the Trump Administration contended, implies that the right to have a firearm inside the perimeters of someone’s house, but that isn’t the part the brief wants to argue; It’s the right to “bear” that is being challenged due to infringements of the strict policies.The Trump Administration brought up as an example a very famous case Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
L. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm
, Nat'l Const. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
Brown, the Court ruled 7-2 that federal labor law preempts California Gov't Code Section 16645.2, which prohibits private employers who are "recipient[s] of a grant of state funds" from "us[ing] the funds to assist, promote, or deter union organizing. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Bush), Martha Craig Daughtrey (Clinton appointee), and Debra L. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
NPR’s Fresh Air discusses United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
”), and State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Fla. 2002) (quoting State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am
’ Chelsea Oxton, The Search Incident to Arrest Exception Plays Catch Up, 43 Creighton L. [read post]
