Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 2701 - 2720 of 14,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:15 pm
  Suppose you also think that Prop 8 does not violate the California state constitution (for the state constitution has just been amended). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 103, we affirm.Footnote 1 of the caseIn a companion case decided today, Yeda Research& Development Co., v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm by Larry
I am thinking about test cases because of Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
Essentially, bail companies abiding by the department’s regulations lose business while those ignoring existing regulations obtain all the business. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]