Search for: "State v. Prime" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
It said: The Inquiry’s parameters were laid down by the Prime Minister and made public on 6 July 2010. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:43 am by Paul F. Prestia
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit came to the same conclusion, regarding intrinsic versus extrinsic evidence, in its 2005 Phillips v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:30 am by Matthew Flinn
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Torture inquiry details announced Government “pays out” Al Rawi mistreatment claimants Terrorism off the agenda, for now Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play Filed under: Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, In the news, Inquests and Inquiries, Terrorism Tagged: Detainee inquiry [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
A foreign private adviser is any investment adviser who (1) has no place of business in the United States; (2) has fewer than 15 clients and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the adviser; (3) has aggregate assets under management attributable to clients in the United States and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the investment adviser of less than $25 million; and (4) does not hold itself out generally to the U.S.… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by Pulat Yunusov
The courts have rejected this position (Canada (Prime Minister) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The prime minister has announced an inquiry into media standards; one positive outcome may be less partial and mischievous misreporting of human rights law. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
The prime minister has announced an inquiry into media standards; one positive outcome may be less partial and mischievous misreporting of human rights law. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
The Honourable Prime Minister Mr Patrick Manning, The Public Service v Ganga Persad Kissoon, heard 12 May 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]