Search for: "State v. Record" Results 2701 - 2720 of 44,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm by Mark Rumold
But we’ll never convince judges or elected officials to respect the privacy rights of those outside the United States if we can’t convince them that Americans’ privacy is worth protecting, too. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
I chose the case of the day, Starski v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert. in the SAF case, McDonald v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 10:04 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As previously reported here, on Sept. 16th, the state Superior Court issued a decision in Barrick v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:29 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Precluding Books & Records Inspections After Commencement of Derivative Litigation - by Tom Bayliss, Abrams & Bayliss LLP On January 28th, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a decision in King v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:58 pm
Companies that hire employees and engage independent contractors in California should brace for a significant slowdown in background checks that include criminal record searches in California state courts.1  This will result from the court of appeal’s opinion in All of Us or None v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
Today's advance release slip criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:21 am
Background check industry groups have mounted a full-court press to remedy the recent slowdown in criminal record searches in California state courts caused by last year’s court of appeal decision in All of Us or None v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am by Aaron Lindstrom
In the pending case of Stand Up for Democracy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:30 am
The Court held that such legislation was valid under Congress's power arising from the Commerce Clause.The decision in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:13 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The en banc Eleventh Circuit ruled this week in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
", scrutinizing the nominee's record in such cases as Dabit v. [read post]