Search for: "State v. Roberts" Results 2701 - 2720 of 17,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Further, the United States argued that Texas, not being harmed by DAPA, lacked standing under the constitution to even bring the suit to federal court.Texas, on behalf of itself and many other states that joined the suit, asserted that it would suffer significant administrative costs [i.e. providing drivers licenses and other government services] devoted to a group of people who are in the country illegally.Chief Justice John Roberts, active during the extended oral… [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 7:55 am
Robert Barnes reports, "State Asks Supreme Court to Allow Execution," in the Washington Post. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Shea looks at the decision at Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
Jackson and its 1977 ruling in Brewer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am by Nate Persily
Gore has some predictive power on approval of the Roberts Court in 2010 mean that the decision has had long-lasting effects? [read post]
” Chief Justice Roberts, on the other hand, appeared ready to tear down the current objective/subjective test when he stated that, “[b]ut to erect this fairly elaborate standard on the basis of that language I think is surprising. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:59 am
After a month long recess the United States Supreme Court is back in session and ready to rule in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:58 pm
So, while there may have been a strong originalist case in Coker, there is scant historical evidence to support a finding for the State in Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Kate Fort
Remedy Brief The four Defendants in this action are largely ignoring this Court’s summary judgment ruling of March 30, 2015, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
Frederick, Thomas wanted to ditch another Warren Court precedent, Tinker, based on his reading of how states interpreted the First Amendment before it even applied to them. [read post]