Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 2701 - 2720 of 20,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by JB
The evidence suggests only that some framers believed that presidents could not be indicted while still in office, which is the position of the Justice Department today. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:40 am by Florian Mueller
If Nokia started to enforce, the appeals court might still stay enforcement on other grounds (technical merits or FRAND/antitrust considerations).Nokia is desperately trying to gain leverage over Daimler and to prevent the Court of Justice of the EU from clarifying the entitlement of component makers to an exhaustive SEP license on FRAND terms.What the Munich appeals court has delivered is quite the opposite of a Christmas present for the lower… [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:36 am by Florian Mueller
If it's not, then the antitrust issues aren't reached in the first place.There's still going to be an automotive patent trial in Munich on Thursday in one Sharp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:06 pm by Josh Blackman
[I'm still not over by Chief Justice Roberts's discussion of direct taxes. ] Nearly twelve years later, I still haven't gotten over NFIB v. [read post]
  Mr Justice Meade of the High Court recently handed down judgment in Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Limited [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:06 pm
Today, the Florida Supreme Court issued the following Order in CASE NO.: SC18-1573, League of Women Voters, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Hursh
The US Supreme Court issued its decision in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am by MBettman
Justice French On October 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
 Justice Stevens had not yet joined the Court in 1972 when a majority invalidated the then-existing death penalty in Furman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had, in a previous post, commented on the observations of the Supreme Court in Booz Allen & Hamilton v SBI Home Finance as regards the power of the Chief Justice to determine questions pertaining to Arbitrability in an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had, in a previous post, commented on the observations of the Supreme Court in Booz Allen & Hamilton v SBI Home Finance as regards the power of the Chief Justice to determine questions pertaining to Arbitrability in an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am by Amy Howe
Origins of the Texas law During his campaign for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump pledged to appoint Supreme Court justices who would vote to overturn Roe and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]