Search for: "THOMAS V DEFENSE" Results 2701 - 2720 of 4,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Arizona (Phoenix) for the win.US v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm by Amy Howe
” Finally, Roberts – joined by Thomas, Gorsuch, and Justice Samuel Alito – dissented from the court’s decision to send the case of Johnson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
California: Defense attorney must follow through on appeal after conviction. 1967 United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
U.S. (1972), expanding the Brady rule to require prosecutors to share with defense counsel any promises of leniency to informant witnesses, and Imbler v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court in a Texas death penalty/ineffective assistance case, Buck v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:03 am
Thomas Allardyce, who questioned any conclusion that fibromyalgia has been definitively linked to trauma.Judge Nealon applied the test of admissibility set forth in Frye v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm by Mark Latham
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am by Burt Neuborne
As the Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 14, April 22, April 29, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 2, June 9, June 16 and June 23 conferences) Thomas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
At times, the “benevolent appellate gods smiled down on me” (36), she writes, with Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am by Michael O'Hear
Defense counsel should (and doubtlessly will) plumb the Roberts opinion, as well as the joint dissent of Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy, for sound bites that can be used in arguments challenging the constitutionality of various federal criminal statutes. [read post]