Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 2,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Ranks right up there with murder and poverty in the scale of obvious social priorities. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:12 am
This all changed when the highest criminal court in Texas ruled in Beeman v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 6:33 am
(The court made clear in that 2004 ruling, Lockyer v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:43 pm
See: USA v Amawi.However, the possibility that the American defendants might be "brought to justice"outside the extradition process might give pause to some who had assumed that this only affected non-citizens. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
I did a rather bad copy of Dali’s painting… not to scale, about ten years ago. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:12 am
Frenkel lawsuit, which involves the filing date of the ESN v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
(People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
The motion court found that the defendant's conduct was dangerous and ill-conceived, but it did not rise to the level of depraved indifference as defined by People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:29 pm
Or merely someone who has half a brain.If you have methamphetamine, marijuana, small baggies, and an electronic scale in your vehicle, as well as a suspended license, do not drive around San Diego -- or anyplace else in California, for that matter -- with your license plate upside down. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:32 pm
* People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
Nonetheless, the Court specifically affirmed the use of a punitive damage awards as a sanction and significantly raised the bar as to the amount of punitive damages that may appropriately be awarded in such cases: The punitive damage award in this case is on the same scale as awards in Whiten [$1 million] and Hill v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
