Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2701 - 2720 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the order of U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Anushka Limaye, Victoria Clark
Arzan Tarapore explained how India can help the United States check China’s rise in region. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
Two major US Supreme Court patent law decisions were delivered yesterday, while the IPKat was busying himself with trade marks and the copyright gap. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
” Maggs also casts doubt on Kaspersky’s claim that it is not an FSB unit, as indicated by public filings. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
""At the time they filed their application, they knew they were seeking a registration for their mark in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:00 pm by Mary Whisner
Mark Litchman was born in 1887, and died 1960. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
When I reported yesterday on a May 10 letter from a bipartisan group of United States Representatives to the ITC concerning injunctive relief over FRAND-pledged standard-essential patents (SEPs) in connection with the investigation of Samsung's complaint against Apple, I had not yet seen a similar letter written by four United States Senators. [read post]