Search for: "United States v. Pauling" Results 2701 - 2720 of 4,493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery –… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources In an unpublished paper entitled “Quacks like a Duck: a New Test for News-Media Libel in the United States”, Carrie Leonetti of the University of Oregon School of Law argues that the actual-malice standard promotes sloppy reporting. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:04 pm by George Washington Law Review
Rev. 1174 (2012) [PDF] Matthew Radler, Privacy Is the Problem: United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
O’Melveney & Myers, Paul Salvaty and Michael Reynolds for Association of Southern California Defense Counsel as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Chris
One thing is for sure Leondra Kruger has made a name for herself, and holds a distinct role as an African-American litigator who feels right at home representing the United States in the highest court in the land. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:05 pm by Stacia A. Wells
EMC Mortgage Corp., Case Number 1:09-cv-03106, United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
”  More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
”  More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]