Search for: "United States v. Texas"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
Nirenberg et al – United States District Court – Western District of Texas – October 18th, 2018) involves the removal of a confederate monument from a public park in San Antonio. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court of Texas. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:47 am
In the latest loss in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 4:00 am
B. 8 litigation allowed a state to get away with anticipatorily overruling Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am
Chase, the author of the Texas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
United States, 807 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir.1986). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
United States, with Steven F. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 6:49 am
After the Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
"), by a pro se litigant in his handwritten complaint against various defendants ("all parties conspired to commit murder against me"), and by a pro se litigant in Newport Beach in a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court in which he raises 58 "Questions Presented," alleges that AT&T is "the biggest terrorist organization in the world," and ends his lengthy petition by saying "the Defendants have conspired to commit… [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:56 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, had diversity jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:07 pm
H-16-1053.United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
Code § 230(b), Congress articulated the "specific policies" behind the adoption of the CDA: `It is the policy of the United States— (1) to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services and other interactive media; (2) to preserve the vibra [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a court can freeze a criminal defendant’s “untainted” assets when the defendant’s “tainted” assets have been spent or cannot be located. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:13 am
Background In Reed v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:47 am
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, recently had a case like this. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm
Part V considered the meaning of the phrase “Office . . . under the United States,” which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
