Search for: "Wheeles v. Wheeles"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 2,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
In James Rose and Robert Underwood v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 10:47 pm
Triumph Actuation Systems LLC v Aeroquip-Vickers Ltd and another [2007] EWHC 1367 (Pat), a Patents Court decision of Mr Justice Pumfrey on Friday 15 June 2007 (available on BAILII here) is a decision that reflects both the strategic options available to the holder of a patent in terms of its pre- and post-grant amendment and on the limitations which the law imposes on amendment so as to prevent abuse.In 1998 Triumph obtained a European patent for a power transfer unit, a piece of hydraulic… [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 3:48 am
Sayah v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
Paulino v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:00 am
Village of Wheeling, No. 1-04-0154 (3/12/07), by clicking here. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 6:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:50 am
Once again, the wheels of justice move in incomprehensible directions. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 9:22 am
Jones v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 3:43 pm
Case name is Howard v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:05 am
Negligence need not be wilful Denfleet International Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:07 am
Cos. v Nemitz, 2007 NY Slip Op 03622. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:29 am
In Bennett et al v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 11:15 pm
Modak-Truran, Secularization, Legal Indeterminacy, and Habermas's Discourse Theory of Law, (2007).From SmartCILP:Martha Minow, Religion and the Burden of Proof: Posner's Economics and Pragmatism in Matzl v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:24 pm
Thus, when the Post quoted Orrin Hatch: "This bill institutes a robust post-grant review process so that third parties can challenge suspect patents in an administrative process, rather than through costly litigation," the Post neglected to mention that this would discriminate AGAINST "little guy" patentees, who don't have the money to defend against "administrative actions" which would cost in the $100,000 range.The Post brought up the recent Alcatel/Lucent… [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 9:48 am
IGT v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, who famously announced a similar reversal in his 1994 dissent from the Court's refusal to consider the relatively routine death penalty case of Callins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:02 pm
Banks v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:35 pm
If he wins, that's all to the good, but if he loses, then the wheels might fall off his Administration very quickly. [read post]
