Search for: "York v York" Results 2701 - 2720 of 52,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, the District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in Association of Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:45 pm by Patent Docs
Katherine Strandburg of the New York University School of Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:05 am by Bill
In HealthNow New York, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mayor of City of New York v Brady, 115 NY 599, 617 [1889]; United States v Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 68 [1878]), or part of a “larger fraudulent scheme” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 11:10 am
New York State's highest court hears oral argument in Golden Gate Yacht Club v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
New York, 2023) Petitioner sought the return of two minor children, RFHA and GLHA, currently residing in the United States with their biological mother and paternal aunt. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:12 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse offers an excellent preview of Wednesday's oral argument in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A complaint was filed against two tenured employees in the Classified Service employed by the New York City Fire Department [Department] with the New York City's Department Equal Employment Opportunity [EEO], alleging that two individuals employed by the Department had engaged in unlawful retaliatory conduct against another of the Department's employee because that other employee's spouse had filed a charge of unlawful discrimination with the United States Equal… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A complaint was filed against two tenured employees in the Classified Service employed by the New York City Fire Department [Department] with the New York City's Department Equal Employment Opportunity [EEO], alleging that two individuals employed by the Department had engaged in unlawful retaliatory conduct against another of the Department's employee because that other employee's spouse had filed a charge of unlawful discrimination with the United States Equal… [read post]