Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 6,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2013, 7:16 pm
Orin Kerr links to this "very interesting decision" at The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:50 am
When: October 3, 2013, 11:30 – 1:30Where: Metropolitan Public Defender’s Office; 630 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 500; Portland, Oregon 97204 Panelists: 1) The Honorable Jean Kerr Maurer, Supervisor, START Court, Multnomah County Courts 2) Russ Belville, Executive Director, 420RADIO.org 3) Sergeant Chris Kenagy, Supervisor, Drug & Vice Task Force, Portland Police Bureau 4) Michael Resnick, M.D., Medical Director of Addiction Psychiatry, Portland Veterans Administration [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:50 am
When: October 3, 2013, 11:30 – 1:30Where: Metropolitan Public Defender’s Office; 630 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 500; Portland, Oregon 97204 Panelists: 1) The Honorable Jean Kerr Maurer, Supervisor, START Court, Multnomah County Courts 2) Russ Belville, Executive Director, 420RADIO.org 3) Sergeant Chris Kenagy, Supervisor, Drug & Vice Task Force, Portland Police Bureau 4) Michael Resnick, M.D., Medical Director of Addiction Psychiatry, Portland Veterans Administration [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2011, I had a post titled “Second Circuit Clerks, Get Ready: Judge Weinstein’s New Opus Concluding Mandatory Minimum For Child Porn Distribution is Unconstitutional (At Least for Younger Defendants). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:15 pm
(Orin Kerr) The very interesting decision is Conley v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
The following is my my prepared statement for today’s hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:52 pm
(Orin Kerr) As Jonathan notes below, Harvard Law professor David Barron, former Acting AAG of the Office of Legal Counsel, has been nominated to fill a vacancy on the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last Friday, I spoke on a very interesting panel about how the Fourth Amendment should respond to new technologies hosted by the Heritage Foundation. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 10:33 am
Kerr has been perhaps the most vocal defender of the third-party doctrine outside of law enforcement so it's unsurprising this paper failed to address it. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 10:31 am
(Orin Kerr) Yesterday I provided a link to the government’s merits brief in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:27 am
(Orin Kerr) In the last year, I’ve become a fairly regular reader of Lawfare, the blog focused on national security law started a few years ago by Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and Robert Chesney. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:19 am
(Orin Kerr) Adam Liptak reports: Supreme Court opinions have come down with a bad case of link rot. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 4:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a few times about the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
Today’s release of two important FISC documents probably won’t generate the media frenzy that previous releases of NSA materials have sparked. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm
(Orin Kerr) The FISC has released an August 2013 opinion, authored by Judge Claire Eagan, on the lawfulness of the NSA’s telephony metadata program. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:51 pm
Tuesday at noon I will be at George Washington Law School in the Moot Court Room, where I expect to finally broker a complete agreement with Orin Kerr about the proper role of the courts. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm
(Orin Kerr) An interesting episode from a new PBS special on the role of neuroscience in criminal law, featuring Nita Farahany. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
Some other views: Paul Caron/TaxProf reaction roundup, Orin Kerr, Hans Bader, Andrew Sullivan readers, Mystal (Kaplan survey). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:05 pm
Orin Kerr has this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, excerpting a recent case in part as follows: Deleting the photograph from plaintiff’s camera amounted to no more than a de minimis violation. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:16 pm
(Orin Kerr) Whether the J.D. degree should take two years or three years is a recurring question in legal education. [read post]
