Search for: "AC " Results 2721 - 2740 of 9,868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  It is plain and well established that neither Article 10 rights to freedom of expression nor Article 8 rights to privacy has, as such, precedence over the other (see Re S (a child) [2015] 1 AC 593 [17]). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
Honing Your Craft: Judicial and Advocate Perspectives on Drafting Persuasive Appellate BriefsCome hear judicial and experienced appellate practitioner insights on all aspects of appellate brief writing. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from William Marshall at ACS Blog, Mark Kende at ACS Blog, Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Allen Ides in The Sacramento Bee, Amy Vitale in an op-ed at The Hill, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times, Stephen Henderson in the Detroit Free Press, William Astore in The Huffington Post, Tony May in an op-ed for Penn Live, Philip Martin in an op-ed at ArkansasOnline, Paul Rosenberg at… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:38 pm by Florian Mueller
From this, one could conclude that either Nokia believed it could quickly deliver these results to the market, or that it had an ace up its sleeve that could deliver value to shareholders another way. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Ltd [2006] QB 125 and OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1) that each publication of photographs or videos is a fresh intrusion of privacy. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Dionne at The Washington Post, Michelangelo Signorile at The Huffington Post, Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand at Slate, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog, and Carolyn Shapiro at the ACS Blog. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords case Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457– where Naomi Campbell claimed the publication of her treatment at Narcotics Anonymous (“NA”) infringed her right to be respected for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on and analysis of the hearings comes from Richard Eskow at OurFuture, William Yeomans at ACSBlog, Adam Winkler, also at ACS Blog, Advice and Consent (podcast), David Fontana at Prawfsblawg, Christopher Ingraham in The Washington Post, Jay Michaelson in The Daily Beast, Robert Schlesinger at US News and World Report, Paul Callan at CNN, and Sen. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
More questions to ask The following list of questions was inspired by Jeff Carr’s ACES (Alliance Counsel Engagement System) Report Card, a system FMC Technologies developed to calculate performance fees awarded to outside counsel, based on their grades on six key factors: Understands goals Expertise Efficiency Responsiveness Predictive accuracy Effectiveness If you plan a longer review, some or all of these questions could be adapted to your situation: Would you ask us again to do… [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:07 am by Kluwer UPC News blogger
 In order to oust the president, a qualified 3/4 majority of the votes in the AC is necessary. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:59 am by GJEL Staff
That may not seem like a huge total compared to roughly 60,000 BART trips, but it’s not insignificant either – it about equals the total ridership of all AC Transit/WestCAT Transbay buses and WETA ferries combined. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm by Jim Robinson
The primary issue at trial was whether or not ACS carried its burden of proving abuse in light of expert testimony proffered by respondents asserting that Isaac’s injuries resulted from the conflation of extreme Vitamin D deficiency and metabolic bone disease. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At the ACS blog, Caroline Frederickson stresses the importance of the hearing, arguing that there “are real concerns raised by the litmus tests that the president promised that his judicial nominee has met” and that “Gorsuch’s record on the bench demonstrates a departure from decades of precedent,” and that because the “hearing is the only opportunity for the public to hear directly from the nominee, himself,” “it is vital that senators ask… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ACS Blog, Peter Shane counters the assertion that there is no principled reason to oppose Gorsuch’s nomination, arguing that “a perfectly principled reason” “is to avoid rewarding Senate Republicans’ 2016 assault on constitutional governance and the Obama presidency. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm by Bill Marler
An Article I wrote in 2001 Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United… [read post]