Search for: "Blood v. Blood"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 7,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
Davis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:36 pm
Recently, in Yiyu Lin v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:26 am
Under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive • no need to commit less safe a ct [Susman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:59 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:06 am
(MCL 625.257(8); People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:14 pm
In a California family law case, Dawn D. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:44 pm
"Because of the decrease in blood volume, it's decreasing overall blood flow and that might be compromising someone who's already at risk for having poor blood circulation to their lower extremities. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:11 am
The case, DeMuth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Spotts, deceased v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
If the operator’s blood alcohol concentration is 0.15 percent or more by weight based upon grams of alcohol per 100 cubic centimeters of blood, then at least 5 years of the sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
Judge Naomi Buchwald on November 22 in CBS Broadcasting v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 2:52 pm
[Akina] i was tempted too, but nah, i had a white car, neva like u guys scrub da blood off. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:49 am
The only criminal case of the three is Bucklew v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 8:19 pm
From Adjunct Law Prof Blog, via Above the Law, Keefe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
Additional Resources: Hansler v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Brandeis’ brief in Muller v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:23 am
King v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Approximately an hour and 20 minutes after the initial radio call, appellant underwent a blood alcohol test which reflected a blood alcohol level of 0.08 percent. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:10 am
That situation was presented in Capps v. [read post]
