Search for: "Brown v. Wells" Results 2721 - 2740 of 4,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence  [2008] 1 AC 153  (see in… [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am by Stephen Wermiel
Some nominees have been more willing to discuss some past cases to a limited extent; almost all nominees discuss Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
[Update 2] The decision, made on 30 November 2010 by Lords Hope, Brown and Mance, can be found on the list on the Supreme Court website. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
They point to cases like Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
However, there is plenty of evidence that civil rights was simply not perceived as a key national issue by the general public until well into the Kennedy administration. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:01 am
Brown, stressing the importance of the trial court's ability to observe jurors first-hand. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
 This should include “efforts to ensure that stablecoins and related activity comply with existing legal obligations, as well as continued coordination and collaboration on issues of c [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
Kennedy flirts with this possibility, as well, but does not embrace it either. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
  Twenty-two states including our own Pennsylvania.A well-deserved tip of the hat to Hank Bullock of Mayer Brown both for successfully arguing the case for the innovator defendants and then thinking enough of us to send the decision along. [read post]