Search for: "California v. United States" Results 2721 - 2740 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2024, 1:37 pm by Raymond Nhan
In all likelihood, the California Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court will eventually consider whether the EFAA’s impact is as broad as Liu and Doe have held. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am by Florian Mueller
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am by Mary A. Fischer
Board of Education On Monday, December 6, San Francisco police are bracing for record crowds to jam the streets surrounding the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:22 am by Howard Friedman
The court said in part:In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
While federal law incorporates state law on service of process when the defendant is to be served in a judicial district of the United States, it does not incorporate state law when the defendant is to be served abroad. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:49 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
The Supreme Court also indicated today that it will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:48 am
The court ordered briefing deferred pending the next decision of the United States Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am by Shane Peagler
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California fully denying Snap’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am by Howard Friedman
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Katrina Diaz
As previously reported, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted EPA’s motions to dismiss for failure to state an affirmative “agency action” that would trigger section 7. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Here is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:42 am by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
  While that decision may well be challenged before the California Supreme Court, it only underscores how California employees have an avenue to try to avoid the impact of United States Supreme Court decisions regarding class actions – PAGA claims. [read post]