Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 26,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
Under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022, any potential claimant has 2 years from the day the Act is enacted to file a claim. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:06 am
Stonegate and the other claimants for example argue that their business interruption insuring clauses are triggered multiple times attracting multiple sub-limits. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
Steyn J said the public interest defence fell away after the Commission’s statement, but that – by that stage – the continuing publication of the Ted talk was not continuing to cause serious harm to the claimant’s reputation. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm
On the claimants’ appeal, who argue that the claim should nonetheless be qualified as contractual in light of the two sales contracts (between the defendant’s parents and the claimants’ (step)mother and between their (step)mother and themselves), with both relevant places of performance being located in Belgium, the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles referred the following questions to the CJEU: 1. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:49 am
Following a protocol letter by Ms Cort’s solicitors, Lambeth Legal responded inn a second letter that Our client does not consider that your client’s age and ethnicity are exceptional, nor do they provide justification for exercising the Council’s powers and/or discretion in your client’s favour. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
David Allen Green’s preliminary view was that “In broad terms, this new legislation makes no real difference to the Human Rights Act 1998” but that it will make rights harder to enforce – not least, in our view, because only claimants with very long pockets will be able to take the option of a trip to Strasbourg. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
After all, civil claims against the gun makers survived a challenge to the claimants’ standing in the Sandy Hook Elementary School case several years ago, creating a potential precedent for any Uvalde filing. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
[FN1]Hedrych recounted claimant's specific job duties over his career for the employer, consistent with claimant's testimony, and summarized his medical findings regarding claimant's limited range of motion, altered sensation, weakness and atrophy, among others. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
[FN1]Hedrych recounted claimant's specific job duties over his career for the employer, consistent with claimant's testimony, and summarized his medical findings regarding claimant's limited range of motion, altered sensation, weakness and atrophy, among others. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
We have examined claimant's remaining contentions and find that none has merit. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
We have examined claimant's remaining contentions and find that none has merit. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
We have reviewed claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
We have reviewed claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Turning to the Court of Claims' dismissal of claimant's ADEA claim, claimant argues that defendant's enforcement of Civil Service Law § 58 violates the federal act. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Turning to the Court of Claims' dismissal of claimant's ADEA claim, claimant argues that defendant's enforcement of Civil Service Law § 58 violates the federal act. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
But she’s not convinced this is viable. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
That’s a nightmare. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
But in this regard, I bear in mind: i) When the claimant’s solicitors wrote [read post]
