Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 17,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 4:39 am
Episode 3 - Jeremy Hutchinson - his career ranged from defending Penguin Books in the Lady Chatterley's Lover obscenity trial, to taking on the might of the British intelligence service in the ABC official secrets trial. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:27 am
The “core rate” of litigation, i.e., the number of companies named as defendants in traditional securities fraud actions, is well below the pre-Sarbanes Oxley level, once we net out the merger disclosure cases that inflate this year’s census. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:08 pm
XL Specialty Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:29 am
The only defendants named in the complaint (which can be found here) are the company’s former CEO and former CFO. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The only significant difference was in cases against companies whose market capitalizations were in deciles 8 and 9 – i.e., the larger defendants, but not the very largest. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
To provide cover for adverse costs, funders often secure “after the event” (“ATE”) insurance in the event that they are ordered to pay defendants’ costs. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:47 pm
It may be due to defense-side instincts borne of a lifetime working on behalf of corporate defendants and their insurers, but I have to say that I find the defendant company’s position here to be sympathetic. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 7:09 am
Rather, Section 16(c) authorizes defendants to remove Securities Act covered class actions involving covered securities to federal court. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
should explain exactly how secure they are and why. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 5:14 pm
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:07 pm
For companies that make public disclosures in Securities and Exchange Commission filings, this could be of even greater concern. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:22 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Russell Todd Burkhalter, founder and CEO of Drive Planning, LLC, his Atlanta-based company. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
This advancement of the law of insider trading provided a new theory of liability in addition to the long-standing classical theory of insider trading, which is premised on a person trading in the securities of her own company by breaching a duty of trust and confidence to the company and its shareholders.Insider trading has taken on increased importance in recent years as the Supreme Court has reaffirmed key principles announced in Dirks (see, e.g., Salman ) and Congress… [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:24 am
Finally, many larger companies with public debt or equity exposure can perform “mock” damages analyses to understand what a potential securities claim against them might look like from a damages and defense cost perspective. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
General Security brought motions for summary judgment against the defendant insurers arguing that each had a duty to defend Foster Frames, as an additional insured, against the D.R. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:21 am
In the third step, the burden shifts back to the SEC to rebut the defendant’s evidentiary showing. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm
At the time of the accident, plaintiff Mariano Lopez was a pedestrian and defendant Ronnell Davis ("Davis") was the operator of a 2009 Dodge Charger that was owned by rental a company, defendant ELRAC. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The company’s CEO was also named as a defendant. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm
A Justice Department indictment shows three defendants conspired to coerce the agricultural labor and services of Thai nationals by fraudulently inducing the recruits to incur substantial debts secured by the workers homes and family land, then confiscating the workers passports, and threatening to repatriate the victims to face destitution, homelessness and other serious harm if they did not remain in the defendants service for meager earnings. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
As such, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a defendant company’s percentage of sales is no longer sufficient, in and of itself, to determine whether or not a company has sufficient business in a particular jurisdiction for purposes of proper venue. [read post]
