Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2019, 2:33 pm
Payors billed by the dental practice included, but were not necessarily limited to: DentaQuest (DentaQuest served as the administrator to the TennCare program – Tennessee’s Medicaid program), Delta Dental and Cigna.[1] Starting in late 2014, a number of payors initiated an SIU dental audit of the defendant’s multi-location dental practice. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
While a mistrial normally does not support a double jeopardy claim, a mistrial must be supported by a manifest necessity when the defendant objects. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 10:51 am
An investigative report does not become privileged, the court explained, merely because it was sent to or prepared by an attorney. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:40 pm
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and seeks to recover damages on behalf of the plaintiff class. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:11 pm
§ 622(5); 1 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:46 am
Taking action in a case like this, holding defendants accountable for acts of negligence and gross negligence, can help assure a similar fate does not befall future guests. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
He had already served 20 months. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
This exemplifies what Europe does. not. need. at. all! [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:36 am
(NYSCEF 1). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 3:18 pm
It does not include anyone obtaining goods or availing services without consideration. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
The lawyer’s white light will now come on at the 20-minute mark, and the red light will illuminate at the 25-minute mark. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:46 am
Stat. [19] Id. [20] § 77.07(2) Fla. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:46 am
Stat. [19] Id. [20] § 77.07(2) Fla. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
Finding no error in the exclusion of EduCap's evident, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s take-nothing judgment in the defendant's favor. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:45 am
§ 20-1-119(a). [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
” The complaint seeks to recover damages on behalf of the class based on allegations that the defendants’ alleged misrepresentations or omissions violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am
Nos. 1, ~~ 2-6, and 33). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
That is because of the Court’s decision 20 years later in San Remo Hotel, L. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
That is because of the Court’s decision 20 years later in San Remo Hotel, L. [read post]