Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 2721 - 2740 of 12,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 8:42 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
In support of its decision, the Court cited the Ninth Circuit case Does I through XXIII v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:28 am
  A trial does not belong to society, nor does it belong to a juror. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
 Inditex v EUIPO Case T-655/17 EU General Court (April 2019) Does the mark ZARA TANZANIA ADVENTURES for travel and tourism take unfair advantage of fashion chain ZARA’s reputation for clothing? [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
My dear readers may not realize that, despite not being a Michigan attorney, I recently sat as the Fourth Justice on the Court of Appeals of Michigan for the case of BHB Investment Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  It is incumbent on this Committee and those in Congress with knowledge of how our intelligence apparatus operates to defend that system as effective and appropriate. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:56 am by Susan Brenner
 Moreover, in this case, the Government does not rely on the same allegations for the two offenses in the Superseding Indictment.The CFAA requires two elements to establish a violation: (1) defendant `intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access’ and (2) defendant `thereby obtains . . . information from any protected computer. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm by Ilya Somin
But I thought that it could probably go through under Raich. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:22 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court quickly runs through the remaining fair use factors and finds them neutral or in favor of defendant. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by Erin Miller
  For all the outrage about this opinion, I have yet to hear anybody seriously defend that result. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Eugene Volokh
So I expect that the conviction would be upheld on appeal, if, as seems likely, the defendant does appeal — though I hope the appellate court will uphold it under the right First Amendment analysis (and thus will avoid setting a precedent that would undermine other First Amendment doctrines). [read post]